Miley Cyrus BJ

>> Tuesday, June 16, 2009


Sponsored Links




People are now scouring the net for the alledge Miley Cyrus BJ image. But I have to tell you that that image is Photoshopped, it was doctored to look like what the pervert who made it want to see. Miley is a minor, please leave her alone! Someone has found the original image of Miley which was used in the doctored image. Check it out here.

2 comments:

Michael June 17, 2009 at 12:45 PM  

The photo is real.

1) EXIF data:

Camera: Research In Motion BlackBerry 9000
Flash: No flash function
Focus: At 0mm
Date: April 9, 2009 1:54:32PM
File: 1,200 × 1,600 JPEG (1.9 megapixels)
183,381 bytes (0.17 megabytes) Image compression: 97%

2) Picture taken at that very night on Miley’s Twitter, with EXIF date proving it - http://img30.imageshack.us/img30/6893/mileyy.jpg. Shows her with the same rosy cheeks and the same hairstyle.

3) The combination diagram, which the Inquisitr, Paparrazzis, and other websites took as evidence for it being a photoshop, was in fact created by a digg.com user to prove that it is real. Her head’s position is a little different than in those two photos, something that cannot be done in photoshop.

4) The original photo had TrainReq’s watermark. Sound familiar? Same guy who leaked all the other Miley photos from her e-mail account.

I’m sick and tired of misinformation being spread around. Tabloid websites should hire people who actually do research, and not just jump to conclusions.

Anonymous June 18, 2009 at 12:00 AM  

It's fake. Someone went to great lengths to make it seem real, hacked EXIF data and all. But they overlooked one simple thing.

The date on the EXIF data is April 9, 2009 at 1:54 PM. Miley was in Nashville, and while there she sent this update at exactly 1:54 PM: http://twitter.com/mileycyrus/status/1485299626

(If you see a different time, bear in mind that Twitter automatically converts updates to the time zones that you are in.)

So, unless Miley was twittering while doing the deed, which is incredibly unlikely... the times do not match up.

My guess? The creator of the photo was on Pacific Time and saw that at 1:15 (which was actually 3:15 in Nashville) Miley went out with Mitchel - see Michael's linked pic - and he/she saw an opportunity and went from there. The doctored photo includes a necklace that *looks* like Mitchel's but actually is not.

Is this "proof" a little far-fetched? Somewhat. However, bear in mind that there are some people who really hate this girl and will go to great lengths to bring her down, including an elaborate photo hoax. Others have said the same thing: that whoever modified the photo is very skilled with photoshop, but at the end of the day, it's still fake.

Just something I noticed when I went back to look at the pic Michael mentioned.

isah liit

  © Blogger template Shiny by Ourblogtemplates.com 2008

Back to TOP